heating curve |
ΔH° rxn = the sum of ( ΔH°f products ) - the sum of ( ΔH°f reactants ) , you can look up the ΔH°f ( the change in enthalpy of formation ) of compounds, then multiply them by the number of moles there is in the reaction ( the coefficient ) and add them together to get the ΔH°f reactants or ΔH°f products. Also if you want a ΔH rxn of a reaction but only have ΔH rxns for other reactions that are similar to yours , you can us Hess's Law to find the ΔH rxn of your wanted reaction. The rules are this: 1 If you multiply a reaction by a number you must also multiply the ΔH rxn by that same number. 2 If you flip a reaction equation around then you change the sign of it's ΔH rxn . And 3 when everything cancels except your desired reactants and products , you can add up the ΔH rxns of all the similar reactions you were given to get your desired ΔH rxn. The second law of thermodynamics states that entropy ( disorder ) increases as time goes on. Entropy's symbol is S and is measured in J/mol*K. Since entropy is disorder it increases with changing states from solid to liquid to gas , and thus with temperature ( Also larger molecules have more entropy , than smaller ones ). ΔS is change in entropy , and can be calculated the same way as ΔH°rx can with products - reactants:
ΔS° rxn = the sum of ( S°products ) - the sum of ( S° reactants ) where S° is the absolute entropy of something ( you can look these up too ). Gibbs Free energy is the free energy available to systems to do work and has the symbol ΔG. It can be calculated like ΔH and ΔS:
ΔG° rxn = the sum of ( G°f products ) - the sum of ( G°f reactants ), But it can also be calculated with ΔG°rxn= ΔH°-TΔS°* , Determining the sign of the change in Gibbs free energy for a reaction lets you determine the thermodynamic favorability of the reaction or if the reaction is thermodynamically favorable. If ΔG is negative the reaction is thermodynamically favorable, while if it is positive it is not thermodynamically favorable, or it is thermodynamically unfavorable.
If something is thermodynamically favorable it will happen without outside influence. But somethings that are thermodynamically favorable just happen to slow for us , like graphite turning into diamond, this means they are under kinetic control. Kinetics and Thermodyanmics are separate in AP Chemistry, Kinetics focusing on the rate or speed and Thermodyanmics on favorability.
When something is thermodynamically unfavorable it needs outside energy to make it happen and the reactant formation is favored ( unless you add energy ) , while in thermodynamically favorable reactions the product is favored. The favorable signs for ΔH and ΔS are - and + respectively. So for a Reaction to be thermodynamically favorable, at least one of its ΔH and ΔS has to be favorable, and if only one is then the favorability depends on temperature. for example if both are positive ( ΔH° is unfavorable and ΔS° is favorable ) then to have a negative ΔG° you would need a high temperature ( and the other way around if both are negative ). If both are favorable ( ΔH° negative and ΔS° positive ) then the favorability of the reaction does not depend on the temperature and ΔG° is always negative ( it is the other way around if both are unfavorable , then ΔG° is always positive , and you have to add energy to make the reaction go ). You can couple unfavorable reactions with favorable ones to make an overall favorable reaction, this is called coupling.
FYI
its been some time since I studied for the test so my information may not be completely accurate and there may been some things not covered, my apologies.
* when you do the math with this equation you have to make ΔH° and ΔS° have the same energy unit ( either kJ or J ) since ΔH° is usually in kJ/mol and ΔS° is usually in J/K*mol ( the Kelvin cancels out with the Kelvin in T )
Note: The sources for these blogs ( this , big idea 2, bonding , IMFs and molecular shapes, and AP Chemistry : Kinetics and Rate ) : Wikipedia, my AP class, and my review books ( AP Chemistry crash course, REA and Princeton review 2015 )
No comments:
Post a Comment